From the site: ChristianProfile
I was reading through the website of what I think is the most disgusting pro-abortion organization out there, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, and found this:
“The pro-life position is really a pro-fetus position, and the pro-choice position is really pro-woman. Those who take the pro-fetus position define the woman in relation to the fetus. They assert the rights of the fetus over the right of the woman to be a moral agent or decision maker with respect to her life, health, and family security.”
So, apparently in choosing to be either pro-life or pro-abortion, we have to choose between the woman and the child.
My question is, why does being pro-life and wanting to save unborn children’s lives make us anti-woman? What could we possibly have against women? Apparently it is because we are “anti-choice” and want to “take women’s choices away and control them.” Why, as a woman, would I be anti-woman or want to control women? And, if pro-life is “pro-fetus” and “anti-woman,” does that mean that pro-abortion is “pro-woman,” but “anti-unborn baby?”
I am all for women making decisions about their own body. But abortion affects not just a woman’s body, but TWO SEPARATE BODIES. Abortion damages women and kills unborn children. I support a woman’s right to kill her baby as much as I support murderers being able to choose whether to kidnap and kill someone else.
Apparently we do not trust women, either. We don’t “trust them to make their own choices.” However, after having an abortion: Read rest of article here